Ramifications of Bhutto Assassination
Sunday, December 30th, 2007
From a media singing the praises of Benazir Bhutto comes a few keenly skeptical voices, among them a razor-sharp commentator called The Stiletto who in Political Mavens depicts a far more complex and morally compromised political figure than the one being lauded in the shock of her assassination, and alludes to the suggestion that “Bhutto may not have been the scourge of Islamofascist terrorists that some believe…”
While realistic about Bhutto’s flaws, Steve Schippert, the tough-minded former marine who edits ThreatsWatch, maintains in a FrontPage interview that “the only significantly popular alternative (to Bhutto) is another former prime minister, Nawaz Sharif. And he has advocated a Pakistani position of unceremonious distancing of Pakistan from the United States and cozying up to the Taliban-al-Qaeda alliance of terrorists and insurgents nested in Pakistan’s tribal regions.”
Schippert concludes that “History can tell us many things. But what it cannot tell us is often more troubling. We are now in uncharted waters with an increasingly unstable nuclear power while a bloodthirsty international terrorist organization thrives within its borders. Not even the fall and breakup of the Soviet Union can compare in potential perils.”
Viewing the Bhutto assassination from an American political perspective, Rossner’s Blog in Haaretz notes that the brutal killing in Pakistan has driven foreign policy issues back to a prominent place in the campaigns where “It is generally accepted that the more seasoned candidates - Clinton and former U.N. ambassador Bill Richardson on the Democrats’ side and McCain and Giuliani on the Republican side - are more experienced in foreign policy than the newcomers.”

