Muslim Anti-Semitism Danger for Israel
“A new Israeli study of anti-Semitism with Muslim roots has concluded that the phenomenon is growing, even in Jordan and Egypt, which have peace treaties with Israel, and that “Anti-Semitism and the accompanying hate industry are a strategic danger for Israel and the Jewish people.” Read more
New Espionage Case Will Be Damaging to Israel
“The new U.S.-Israel espionage affair revealed Tuesday is in fact an old story. Nothing in this fact, however, can reduce the gravity of damage it will cause Israel, nor lead to expectations that suspect Ben-Ami Kadish’s punishment will be eased - if he is indeed to be convicted in a court of law.” Read more
Hamas Clarifies Intentions
“It didn’t take long for Hamas to clarify their intentions. Two hours after Carter’s speech was broadcast on Israel radio, Hamas leader Khaled Maschal, who had held extensive meetings with Carter in Damascus, denied that any such assurance had been made. Maschal, who had overseen Carter’s talks with other Hamas leaders in Egypt and in Gaza, once again reaffirmed the Hamas commitment to liquidate the Jewish state. Not for the first time, the ex-president was left looking like a dupe of the terrorists.” Read more
Meanwhile, progressive Zionist Bradley Burston has two words for Hamas-Defensible Borders. Read more
Iran’s Nuclear Intentions
The AP reports that “Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he believes Iran is hell bent on acquiring nuclear weapons, but he warned in strong terms of the consequences of going to war over that.
Another war in the Middle East is the last thing we need and, in fact, I believe it would be disastrous on a number of levels, he said in a speech he was delivering Monday evening at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y.
He said he favors keeping the military option against Iran on the table, given the destabilizing policies of the regime and the risks inherent in a future Iranian nuclear threat - either directly or through proliferation.” Read more
Caroline Glick has a more decisive evaluation of options to use against Iran arguing that deterrence will not be any more effective than appeasement:
“There are two reasons that a deterrence model will be as ineffective in curbing Iranian aggression as Obama’s appeasement model. First, as last week’s 25th anniversary of the Iranian-sponsored bombing of the US embassy in Beirut recalled, Iran has been attacking the US and its allies both directly and through proxies since 1979. To date, not only has the US failed to deter such attacks, it has never made Iran pay a price for them. With this abysmal track record against a non-nuclear Iran, it is hard to see how the US can threaten a nuclear-armed Iran with sufficient credibility to make a deterrence-based strategy successful.
“The second reason that basing US policy towards Iran on a deterrence model will likely fail is because Iran’s leadership has made clear that is not necessarily concerned about the survivability of Iran. From Ayatollah Khomeini to Ayatollah Khamenei to Ali Rafsanjani to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran’s leadership has made clear that they are not Iranian patriots but global Islamic revolutionaries. Given their millenarian, apocalyptic view of their country’s purpose in world affairs, there is good reason to believe that a strategy based on some form of mutually assured destruction would have only marginal impact on Iran’s decision-makers.”